How to Perform a Systematic Review in Healthcare and Clinical Research

by Posted on

How to Perform a Systematic Review in Healthcare and Clinical Research

Introduction

In healthcare and clinical research, decisions must be grounded in the highest quality evidence. A systematic review is a powerful research tool that helps summarize and evaluate findings from multiple studies on a specific clinical question.

By following a methodical, preplanned process, systematic reviews minimize bias and maximize reliability — making them an essential part of evidence-based medicine (EBM). This guide will walk you through how to perform a systematic review step-by-step in a healthcare or clinical research setting.

Understanding the Role of Systematic Reviews in Healthcare

Systematic reviews are not simply academic exercises — they influence real-world clinical guidelines, treatment recommendations, and public health policies.

For example:

  • The World Health Organization (WHO) uses systematic reviews to shape vaccination schedules.

  • The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) bases many of its drug approval decisions on systematic review findings.

Step-by-Step Guide: How to Perform a Systematic Review in Clinical Research

1. Define the Clinical Research Question

  • Use PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) or SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type) frameworks.

  • Example: “In patients with type 2 diabetes (Population), does intermittent fasting (Intervention) compared to continuous calorie restriction (Comparison) improve glycemic control (Outcome)?”

2. Develop and Register the Protocol

  • Outline methods, databases, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and outcome measures.

  • Register with PROSPERO or Cochrane to ensure transparency.

3. Conduct a Comprehensive Literature Search

  • Use multiple databases:

    • PubMed / MEDLINE for biomedical literature.

    • Cochrane Library for controlled trials.

    • Embase for pharmaceutical research.

  • Apply Boolean operators and MeSH terms for precision.

  • Search grey literature sources like dissertations, conference proceedings, and trial registries.

4. Screening and Selection Process

  • Title & Abstract Screening – Discard irrelevant results.

  • Full-Text Review – Apply inclusion/exclusion criteria.

  • Use software like Rayyan to manage screening and reduce reviewer bias.

5. Data Extraction

  • Create a standardized data extraction form to collect:

    • Study design and setting.

    • Sample size and participant demographics.

    • Intervention and control details.

    • Outcomes measured and results reported.

6. Assess Quality and Risk of Bias

  • For RCTs (Randomized Controlled Trials): Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Tool.

  • For observational studies: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

  • For diagnostic studies: QUADAS-2.

7. Data Synthesis

  • Narrative Synthesis – If studies are too heterogeneous.

  • Meta-Analysis – If data can be statistically pooled.

  • Use statistical software like RevMan, Stata, or R for analysis.

8. Reporting Results

  • Follow PRISMA guidelines for transparency.

  • Include:

    • A PRISMA flow diagram of study selection.

    • Tables summarizing study characteristics and results.

    • Discussion of limitations and implications.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid in Healthcare Systematic Reviews

  • Narrow search strategies that miss relevant studies.

  • Not double-screening articles, leading to bias.

  • Failing to assess grey literature, which can skew results.

  • Inadequate reporting, making replication impossible.

Best Practices for High-Quality Healthcare Systematic Reviews

  • Work with a medical librarian to optimize searches.

  • Engage multiple reviewers to minimize selection bias.

  • Update the review regularly to keep it relevant.

  • Disclose funding sources to avoid perceived conflicts of interest.

Conclusion

Performing a systematic review in healthcare requires careful planning, rigorous methodology, and commitment to transparency. When done correctly, these reviews not only summarize existing research but also directly influence patient care and health policy.

By following the structured process outlined here — from defining your research question to publishing under PRISMA guidelines — you can ensure your systematic review becomes a valuable contribution to clinical science.

Published by oriaku