how to use Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2)
The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2) is a structured method for assessing potential biases in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Below is a step-by-step guide on how to use it effectively:
Step 1: Understand the Five Domains of Bias
The RoB 2 evaluates bias across five key domains:
- Randomization process
- Deviations from intended interventions (effect of assignment to intervention)
- Missing outcome data
- Measurement of the outcome
- Selection of the reported result
Each domain is assessed separately, and an overall risk of bias judgment is made.
Step 2: Gather Necessary Information
Before assessing bias, ensure you have:
✔ The full-text RCT paper
✔ Study protocol (if available, to check selective reporting)
✔ Trial registration details (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov)
Step 3: Assess Each Domain
For each domain, answer signaling questions (usually Yes/Probably Yes/No/Probably No/No Information) to determine bias risk.
1. Bias arising from the randomization process
- Was allocation sequence random?
- Was allocation concealed (e.g., sealed envelopes, central randomization)?
- Were baseline differences between groups likely due to chance?
- Judgment: Low/Some concerns/High risk
2. Bias due to deviations from intended interventions
- Were participants and personnel blinded?
- Were there unintended crossovers or contamination?
- Were deviations from the protocol balanced between groups?
- Judgment: Low/Some concerns/High risk
3. Bias due to missing outcome data
- Was dropout balanced between groups?
- Were reasons for missing data explained?
- Was analysis performed using intention-to-treat (ITT) principles?
- Judgment: Low/Some concerns/High risk
4. Bias in measurement of the outcome
- Were outcome assessors blinded?
- Could outcome measurement differ between groups?
- Judgment: Low/Some concerns/High risk
5. Bias in selection of the reported result
- Were all pre-specified outcomes reported?
- Was there evidence of selective reporting (e.g., omitted unfavorable results)?
- Judgment: Low/Some concerns/High risk
Step 4: Determine Overall Risk of Bias
- Low risk: All domains rated as low.
- Some concerns: At least one domain has “some concerns” but no high risk.
- High risk: At least one domain is high risk, or multiple domains have concerns.
Step 5: Document and Justify Your Judgments
- Use the RoB 2 Excel tool (available from Cochrane) to record responses.
- Provide justifications for each judgment (e.g., “Allocation concealment was unclear”).
Example Assessment
Domain | Judgment | Justification |
---|---|---|
Randomization process | Some concerns | Randomization method unclear |
Deviations from intended interventions | Low risk | Blinding was well-described |
Missing outcome data | Low risk | ITT analysis performed |
Measurement of the outcome | Low risk | Assessors blinded |
Selection of reported result | High risk | Primary outcome not reported |
Overall Risk of Bias: High (due to selective reporting).
Additional Tips
- Use the official RoB 2 guidance for complex cases.
- For cluster RCTs or crossover trials, use specialized RoB 2 variants.
- Train multiple reviewers to ensure consistency (calculate inter-rater reliability).
Would you like a worked example of an RCT appraisal using RoB 2?